![]() |
Administrators :saucer, Iseason, us2u | |
| Forum Physiks Causali |
Not logged | Login
|
|
| Online:There are 5 online. Click here to see more | ||
Register |
Profile |
Private messages |
Search |
Online | Help
| Create a free blog | ||
![]() | ||
|
| ![]() | ![]() |
| Author : | Topic: how to define an antiderivative | Bottom |
| zee Posts : 115 |
I am not an expert when it comes to effectively using the CAS in SWP/SN but I have found that with some work I can get most things done. I worked on your problem some and found that if I first define f(x), which can be most any reasonable function, and then define F(x) in the way you suggested all seems to work. Now, I know you will want to change f(x). Doing so does not present a problem, I tried several functions and F(x) updated correctly. |
| Ameny Intef IV Posts : 28 Rameses II ![]() |
| |||
| DYNASTY 13 ~ Wegaf, Ameny Intef 1V, Hor, Sobekhotep 11, Khendjer, Sobekhotep 111, Neferhotep 1, Soberkhotep 1V, Ay, Neferhotep 11 |
|
| ![]() | ![]() |
Get a free forum!
AceBoard Free Forum v 5.3
Download Premium Web Templates!