-

http://www.atm.ox.ac.uk/user/palmer/tdse.html#TDSE


-

-


   


-  

--Last edited by saucer on 2007-01-03 00:53:22 --

-







-

-

http://ocw.mit.edu/NR/rdonlyres/Mathematics/18-238Fall2002/D12DC549-9821-4367-B941-80E5FBE96319/0/sec1.pdf

http://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/Mathematics/18-238Fall2002/LectureNotes/index.htm


-  

--Last edited by saucer on 2007-01-04 08:19:19 --

What worries me about the seperating of quantum and classical mechanics is that they are dependant on each other for thier very exsistence.
   Of course , according to current thinking , only classical depends on quantum. however the container in which quantum operates is is a classical one.
   So there is a barrier which prevents the two from joining up.
In other posts I have argued singular particle theory. The barrier here is time and space. If the electron can behave as if it is everywhere at once in an atom , then the barrier still exsists between classical and quantum.
   with limited pathways allowed it due to the invasion of space , the particle has been slowed to a mere 300,000 mps when it gets into classical sizes.
   this doesn't prevent it from visiting every point in space that is not invaded by time and space "as if it were everywhere at once". In other words , quantum is made in the same way as the original causality. but the motion of 'mass' is limited to light speed, so that the mass doesn't violate the universal averages. remember that if what makes mass, "quantum particles " is already moving as if it were everywhere at once "within quantum" , The only allowable motion is that which would put the particle "everywhere at once " within the space "cavity"

Cheers
Iseason

-
a new "read...." [book review]

http://www.blacklightpower.com/theory/book.shtml


-