-


http://www.paradox-paradigm.nl/%5CQuantum%20mechanics%20and%20the%20ether.htm  


I know that this Link is ostensibly maths Iseas,  .....BUT ...can you make any sense of ..?


saucer  !!



-  

--Last edited by saucer on 2007-04-17 08:23:48 --

I think the problem lies in using Newtonian judgements while denying the presence in an atomic state.
If you were to say that an electron is at a constant speed of quantum as are the protons and other fundamentals because they camn only be in that many "occuring" positions according to the number of possible occurances , you would have a better design.
  I am not sure that I am advocating an aether any more. Rather a setting of likely states occuring .

  If I can broaden this , let's say my arguement that the straight line exists in only two states .
1. Largest
2. Smallest

centrifugal forces (and atomic behaviours ) are siply one level of this behaviour. If the picture is of two states. The smallest creates the largest , so in fact the one particle still exists.
   The central "occurance'  , If it had the ability to move in a straight line , would never meet itself on an outwards bound course. Once reflected from the outer limits( for a better picture ) , The particle would inevitably meet itself on the inwards journey.Because of particle size, the central zone now becomes a no-go zone because the particle CANNOT meet itself.    
       Over time , the amount of "no go zones" increases , Both in the centre and the extreme. Eventually causing a curved pathway to avoid meeting itself.

     The "density" of the centre is built on the "alienation of energy" as we know it and is a false , false.

Cheers
Iseason